They have absolutely no idea what this doctor did. And they are so far gone that they don’t want to know. Try to tell them and they cover their ears and go "NO NO NO!" I don’t hear you!
This doctor provided treatment for infertility so women could GET pregnant.
He treated women as people; he got to know them, their lives, their partners. Dr. Tiller treated women with respect as intelligent and responsible people.
.
He believed women deserved the best treatment to meet the needs of their lives. He did not think they were peons to be taken care of by lawmakers and doctors who knew better than they do. He believed that women had the right to make decisions for themselves.
When women who had been happily pregnant without any intention of abortion, until they received the horrible news about their babies….
"Late term" abortions are performed in cases where a baby has severe birth defects (like no brain, organs developed outside the body).
These are not preformed because a woman changes her mind about having a baby. These are heart-breaking decisions that are made with compassion for the child more than for the mother herself.
This doctor also saved women’s lives. He cared and he was not a baby killer. These procedures are only done in extreme circumstances. What is a woman to do without this choice? I hate to think what that might be.
Tx woman – I didn’t think retards like you would read the whole thing. Go be stupid somewhere else.
El – source please?
Tony – source please?
Glassy – you didn’t read it either, about late term abortions, did you? DID YOU?
See this what I was saying about not wanting to know. You just don’t want to hear what the truth actually is.
www.encognitive.com Why are the FDA and WTO against dietary supplements? It has to do with Codex, which is covertly controlled by the pharmaceutical industry… “The fact that the FDA ban of L-Tryptophan and the Newsweek Prozac cover story occurred within four days of each other went unnoticed by both the media and the public. Yet, to those who understand the effective properties of L- Tryptophan…the concurrence seems ‘unbelievably coincidental.’” – The FDA Ban of L-Tryptophan Politics, Profits and Prozac, Dean Wolfe Manders, Ph.D., Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2 Winter 1995 As with L-tryptophan, 5-HTP, as a serotonin precursor, has potential to effect a wide range of bodily functions, including, but not limited to mood, appetite, sleep and sexual function. Its effects on sexual functions are least known. There is the hypothesis that 5-HTP might be nature’s potent aphrodisiac. As results of a number of studies have shown, 5-HTP definitely plays a role in sexual orientation, motivation, and behavior through some synergistic pathway with testosterone. In addition, 5-HTP is also found to effect sexual maturation and response in a circadian manner. www.backlash.com
Matthew 19:12
For there are eunuchs who were born that way from their mother’s womb; and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men; and there are also eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to accept this, let him accept it.
Eunuchs are who made eunuchs by men are obvious. It’s someone who’s been castrated. And Eunuchs who are for the sake of Heaven is obvious. It’s a celibate man who abstains for religious reasons. But what is the third type: a born eunuch?
The two main arguments is that it means a homosexual or a man who is literally born a eunuch. But the second argument is faulty because:
1. You can’t be born a eunuch. Castration is a surgical process.
2. The chances of being born without testicles is rare.
3. Rabbi Eliezer says he believes these "born eunuchs" can be cured. If they were talking about men who were born without testicles or men who were infertile like in example 2, that would be impossible. The rabbi wasn’t a doctor and infertility or lack of testicles would be an impossible feat (it’s impossible to cure now, much less back then). So it’d be odd for a rabbi to want to cure a man born without testicles when there was no way to do so.
So I support the idea it means a homosexual man. But no one will give me any other explanation with any support. They just say "No, it doesn’t" with no background or reasoning.
David, you did exactly what I said NOT TO DO. You just said "No, it doesn’t" without giving any background for your answer.
David, are you serious? "Rather, it is a person that chose to not marry, to serve the Lord in a very deep way." That’s already mentioned or did you not even read the post? That would be a eunuch for the Kingdom of Heaven. A man who chooses not to marry for religious reasons. You did not address my question: what is the born eunuch if not a homosexual man?
